Student Assembly Meeting
Thursday, October 9, 2025
If you need accessibility assistance with a PDF document, contact the Office of the Assemblies.
-
Term:
2025-2026
- Assembly/Committee: Student Assembly
-
Date & Time:
Thu, Oct 9, 2025 - 4:45pmto6:30pm
-
Location:
Willard Straight Hall Memorial Room (WSH407)/Zoom
-
Agenda:
Student Assembly Agenda 10_09_2025 (1).pdf (145.3 KB)
- Meeting Packet:
- Audio Recording:
-
Minutes:
I. Call to Order
a. Chair Z. deRham called the meeting to order at 4:45 PM.
b. Members Present: D. Addoquaye, A. Aftab, S. Agarwal, L. Blum, D. Carson, Z.
deRham, G. Dorward, M. Ehrlich, C. Flournoy, L. Han, V. Kakra, C. Kim, K.
Krishtopa, J. Purcell, H. Spector, J. Swavy, C. Tarala, A. Vallecillo, T. Waguespack, H.
Watkins, J. Wu, E. Yao, K. Young
c. Members Absent: E. Galperin (Excused), C. Kim, J. Purcell, A. Walters
d. Also Present: University President Michael Kotlikoff, Vice President Ryan Lombardi.
II. Reading of the Land Acknowledgment
a. Z. deRham stated the land acknowledgement
III. Approval of the Minutes
a. Approval of the September 25, 2025 Meeting Minutes
i. Z. deRham motions to approve the minutes.
ii. Z. deRham motions to move Presentations to right after approval of
meeting minutes and move on to public comments next. The motion to
change agenda passes by unanimous consent.
iii. The motion to approve the minutes passes through unanimous consent.
IV. Presentations
a. University President Michael Kotlikoff and Vice President of Student & Campus
Life Ryan Lombardi. They discuss Cornell's current relationship with the federal
government, attempt to restore federal grants, and the updates on the Student Code
of Conduct.
V. Public Comments
a. A. Vallecillo motions to extend public comment indefinitely until all speakers are
finished. The motion to extend speaking time was rejected by a vote of 7-9-1.
b. Speakers argued for a judiciary independent of the university and urged the
committee to pass resolution 10 unamended.
c. Several speakers shared concerns of budget cuts, especially for ALANA and MGFC.
They argue that Cornell cannot be world class without being open to the world and
that these cuts cultivate culture, community, and belonging at Cornell.
d. M. Ehrlich motions to extend public comment by five minutes, no dissent.
e. The chair would smile favorably upon a motion to extend the meeting to 7:45 PM.
The motion to extend the meeting was approved by unanimous consent.
VI. Consent Calendar
a. None.
VII. Reports of Officers, Committees, and Liaisons
a. Finance Committee recommendation
i. Presented by H. Watkins and C. Tarala.
ii. African Latino Asian and Native American Intercultural Board submits a
petition, requesting an allocation of $14.00.
iii. The Appropriations Committee's original recommendation to decrease
allocation for ALANA to $9.90 is rejected by unanimous consent.
iv. Multicultural Greek & Fraternal Council submits a petition, requesting an
allocation of $3.00.
v. H. Watkins moves to enter into the executive session. Approved by vote of
9-7-0. The assembly enters executive session.
vi. H. Watkin moves to reject the Appropriations Committee's original
recommendation to decrease allocation for MGFC to $0.90. Approved by
vote of 16-0-2.
vii. International Students Association submits a petition, requesting an
allocation of $10.00.
viii. M. Ehrlich moves to close debate and reject The Appropriations
Committee's original recommendation. No dissent against closing debate.
ix. The Appropriations Committee's original recommendation to decrease
allocation for ISA to $8.00 is rejected by a vote of 11-4-0.
VIII. Second Readings
a. Resolution 11
i. H. Specter addresses the concern that many on campus park their bikes in
handicap-accessible aisles and ramps, making people unable to get around
them. This act is illegal and goes against the Americans with Disabilities Act,
so they request Campus facilities and services to put up signs to inform
students it's illegal and their bikes may be removed by the police.
ii. L. Han motions to mass the resolution. The motion to pass the resolution
was approved by unanimous consent.
IX. Third Readings
a. Resolution 10
i. A. Vallecillo reiterates the student's desire for rights to be respected.
ii. T. Waguespack comments that adding staff and faculty dilutes and drowns
out student voices. He moves to strike 83 and 88 and replace it with "Be it
further resolved that the Student Code of Conduct be revised by a
committee composed exclusively of undergraduate, graduate, and
professional students, ensuring that the process reflects student perspectives
across all divisions of the university. Be it finally resolved that this committee
shall be composed of 15 student members confirmed by the Student
Assembly, consisting of 4 representatives of the Student Assembly, 4
representatives of the Graduate Professional Student Assembly, 1 graduate
student trustee, one undergraduate student trustee, one residence hall
association representative, one student-athlete Advisory Council
representative, one multicultural Greek and Fraternal council representative,
1 inter-fraternity council representative, and one Panhellenic Council
Representative, and that the revised Code of Conduct produced by this
committee shall be submitted for approval to the Student Assembly and
Graduate and Professional Student Assembly, followed by review and
ratification by the University Assembly, the Faculty Senate, and the
University Administration in accordance with shared governance
procedures".
iii. A. Aftab moves to end debate on the amendment, no seconds, debate
continues.
iv. A. Vallecillo argues that the University Administration wants to reject the
amendment and that the faculty acts as a counterbalance to prevent a
student majority that may push their own interests. He advises not to pass
this amendment, as it would make it easier for the University Administration
to shoot down the resolution.
v. T. Waguespack counters that the committee is just a way for people to talk to
the administrators and has nothing it can do. He doesn't think there should
be voices that don't represent student interests.
vi. The Chief of Staff agrees that students should have the only say, as they also
don't have a say in faculty code of conduct. He expresses uncertainty about
the incentive to include faculty other than make it more easily approved by
the administration.
vii. D. Carson shares that incorporating staff is a part of the history of shared
governance.
viii. A. Aftab reminds the committee that the students don't want any
amendments, and just wants it to pass. She moves to end the debate. The
motion to close the debate is approved by a vote of 6-4-2.
ix. The amendment fails by a vote of 3-8.
x. M. Ehrlich moves to vote by roll call on Resolution 10 by unanimous
consent.
xi. Resolution 10 passes by a vote of 21-2-1.
X. Announcements
a. Z. deRham announces for the committee to check their emails about SUNY Student
Assembly.
b. Z. deRham announces that committee lists are updated in the box. Committee
chairs must email their membership to set up a meeting by the 16th.
XI. Appointments and Vacancies Calendar
a. There will be 8 people interviewing for vacancies next week.
The meeting was adjourned at 7:39 PM by unanimous consent.
Respectfully Submitted,
Sophia Lin
Clerk of the Assembly
SA Minutes 10-9-25 (2).pdf (170.42 KB)
Associated Resolutions
| Resolution | Abstract | Status |
|---|---|---|
| SA R10 (2025-2026): Condemning the Administration’s Undemocratic Review of the Student Code of Conduct and Affirming Cornell’s System of Shared Governance | This resolution addresses the central administration’s betrayal of Cornell’s commitment to shared governance and condemns the exclusion of the elected Assemblies in its revision of the Student Code of Conduct (“Code”). It invokes Article 3, Section 1 of the Charter to request all information regarding the selection of the voting members of the Standing Code and Procedures Review Committee and calls for the Code to be revised by representatives of the elected Assemblies. | Submitted to the President |
| SA R11 (2025-2026): Addressing Obstructed Ramps and Handicap Aisles on Campus | Bikes and electric scooters are often parked or locked on wheelchair accessible ramps and handicap aisles around campus. This poses a challenge to disabled students who need to use these ramps and handicap aisles due to mobility issues and/or use of mobility aids. This resolution seeks to mitigate this issue by recommending that Facilities and Campus services place signs that expressly prohibits obstructing these areas around campus. | Submitted to the President |